depwl9992 / anomalyjobs

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/anomalyjobs
0 stars 0 forks source link

+job/assign prevents reassigning from people without access #161

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Assign some jobs to someone
2. Yank all their access out
3. Try to reassign the jobs back to the jgroup

What is the expected output?

(Like any normal job assignment)

What do you see instead?

+jgroupname member ExStafferName does not have access to that bucket.

What version of the product are you using? On what MU* Server?

Jobs 6.4 on TinyMUX 2.10

Please provide any additional information below.

Likely out-of-order checks, similar to #160.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by lasht...@gmail.com on 18 Nov 2011 at 7:05

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Can you make the change from r409 and see if it fixes this issue?

I need to get version 6.5 out at some point.

Original comment by widdis@gmail.com on 21 Nov 2011 at 1:41

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Er, disregard comment 1, or at least clarify it below.

The message given indicates that the member without access is still a member of 
the jgroup.  You should be able to remove them from the jgroup (after applying 
the code change in r409) and then the job reassignment should work.  So I'm not 
sure this is a new issue as just a followon capability lost if you haven't 
applied the Issue 160 fix.

Original comment by widdis@gmail.com on 21 Nov 2011 at 1:58

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Confirmed, removing them from the jgroup fixed this.  Probably okay to close 
this out; the error message really is about as clear as it can be and I should 
have understood what it meant.

Original comment by lasht...@gmail.com on 21 Nov 2011 at 8:53

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Not your fault this next release is so slow in coming.  I hate do do a release 
for only one line of code though! :)

Original comment by widdis@gmail.com on 22 Nov 2011 at 6:44