Closed ishbu closed 9 years ago
Credit to @distracteddev for the bug discovery and help on implementation
LGTM
"i.e. for the following value [null, null, {value:3}] attempting to set an object at the 0th index of the array would result in the object instead being pushed to the end of the array"
I think you meant to say "pushed to the beginning of the array"
Yep thats correct, the erroneous behavior would be that the object would be pushed to the beginning of the array, instead of replacing the null value at the 0th index
LGTM, but i think we should have a unit test that goes along with this
…null values in an array
This fixes a bug where when creating an implied operation on an array with null values, a ListInsert operation was erroneously created.
i.e. for the following value
[null, null, {value:3}]
attempting to set an object at the 0th index of the array would result in the object instead being pushed to the end of the array