Closed highsource closed 6 years ago
@derhuerst By the way I think you were right about (data, opts, ctx)
vs. (data, ctx, opts)
.
The signature (data, opts, ctx)
feels better. The end-user will probably more often need to specify opts
than ctx
.
As discussed in derhuerst/wfs-gml-to-geojson#3, let us refactor function signatures to function signatures to
(data, ctx, opts)
.I'll do the work on a branch in https://github.com/highsource/parse-gml-polygon and send a PR.
This is a breaking change so we have to pump the major version.