CWR Report

[changhoonhahn]

Below are tasks that need to be completed to address the CWR report. They will be continuously updated. If you addressed any of the tasks in the draft (https://www.overleaf.com/1556221963fdmbcfczbmcd), please mark it below. If you have any questions, you can leave a comment on the issue.

• Missing references through the draft:
  • [x] Section 1: growth of structure constraints from galaxy groups and clusters
  • [x] Section 1: growth of structure constraints from galaxy-galaxy weak lensing
  • [x] Section 1: small-scale density field forward modeling
  • [x] Section 1: environment dependent luminosity function
  • [x] Section 1: clustering properties of dwarf galaxies
• [x] Section 3.1: Fraction of area removed by bright star mask
• [x] Section 4.3: Add a sentence on what happens to the priority of BGS targets that are bumped due to sky fibers or reobserved.
• [x] Section 4.3: mention that white dwarfs can enter at higher priority
• [x] Section 4.3: fill in details regarding the per tile sky and standard star fiber requirements.
• [x] Section 5.1: explain how transparency is described
• [x] Section 5.1: citation for GFA
• [x] Section 5.1: MTL failed redshift criteria
• [x] Section 5.1: main survey numbers
• [x] Section 5.1: spectro-perfectionism reference
• [x] Section 5.2: move bright star masking details to TS
• [x] Section 5.2: check Eq 11. numbers. They don't match at m = 2.9
• [x] Section 5.2: explain "systematic property"
• [x] Section 5.3: list purity and completeness of BGS Faint in addition to BGS Bright
• [x] Section 5.3: details on survey speed
• Fill in any acknowledgements

[michaelJwilson]

Section 5.2; Omar validated DR9, but both Omar and Pauline's misunderstood it was just a radius change, not a slope change. Difference is minimal. Text on Stellar masking criteria moves back to target selection.

[forero]

"Section 4.3: fill in details regarding the per tile sky and standard star fiber requirements." Done.

[michaelJwilson]

Colour-colour, Fig. 13. limit to a redshift slice e.g. at the redshift peak.

[changhoonhahn]

Section 5.1: MTL failed redshift criteria

I've just referenced this away to Myers et al (in prep.)

[changhoonhahn]

Section 5.1: citation for GFA

DESI instrument design paper

[changhoonhahn]

Section 5.1: spectro-perfectionism reference

Bolton et al. (2010)

[changhoonhahn]

Bright Star masking details now moved to target selection section

[changhoonhahn]

• Bright star masking fraction
• Bright star masking radii equation fixed