coveralls
commented
1 year ago Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 4788569781
- 0 of 14 (0.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 2 files are covered.
- 1 unchanged line in 1 file lost coverage.
- Overall coverage decreased (-0.06%) to 50.372%
| Changes Missing Coverage | Covered Lines | Changed/Added Lines | % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| py/fastspecfit/fastspecfit.py | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | ||
| py/fastspecfit/io.py | 0 | 12 | 0.0% | ||
| <!-- | Total: | 0 | 14 | 0.0% | --> |
| Files with Coverage Reduction | New Missed Lines | % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| py/fastspecfit/io.py | 1 | 53.88% | ||
| <!-- | Total: | 1 | --> |
| Totals | |
|---|---|
| Change from base Build 4677545300: | -0.06% |
| Covered Lines: | 2236 |
| Relevant Lines: | 4439 |
Small update to the stack fitting input and QA plotting.
Changes to the input to match the input format to the format specified here: https://github.com/desihub/desigal/pull/17
Both z=0 and z>0 can now be inputted and if z>0 luminosity distance etc. will be calculated.
More line plots in the diagnostic diagram. When I expanded the wavelength range of the stacks I needed more line plot space otherwise the QA would crash. I did slightly break the nice layout of the QA plots (see fig below). The location of the axis labels + size of tick labels might need to be adjusted.
A example of saving stacks to a format that can be ingested in the fastspecfit stackfit is shown in the desigal repo.