Govinda found that I wasn't using the per-objtype fiberloss inputs from the desimodel throughput files. This pull request fixes that.
Note that the whole concept of a single fiberloss per object type isn't correct: this should be based upon seeing, object size, object profile, and fiber misalignment (see issue #11). This is an intermediate step which is better than doing nothing.
Tests pass (including new ones), and integration test still works.
Govinda found that I wasn't using the per-objtype fiberloss inputs from the desimodel throughput files. This pull request fixes that.
Note that the whole concept of a single fiberloss per object type isn't correct: this should be based upon seeing, object size, object profile, and fiber misalignment (see issue #11). This is an intermediate step which is better than doing nothing.
Tests pass (including new ones), and integration test still works.