Closed cmeeren closed 5 years ago
Thanks, @cmeeren 👍
If anyone has any ideas why this would be the case, a PR would be welcome.
Thanks @cmeeren, it seems to be due to this union being a ‘Struct‘ and we did not add support for that kind of union yet. I agree we should add support for this in the same way as other unions.
Thanks again 👍
Happy to be of help, hope it's a quick fix. ^_^
It should be a quick fix, we just need to find the APIs that we can use instead of this
| t when FSharpType.IsUnion t ->
let case, fields = FSharpValue.GetUnionFields(value, t)
let properties = (case.GetFields(), fields) ||> Seq.map2 lep
result <- StructureValue(properties, case.Name)
true
FYI, Suave.SerilogExtensions implements a proper destructuring mechanism for F# types (using Json -> LogEvent
) see Destructure.fs
Is this still really open? Just ran this in a test project:
Log.Logger <-
LoggerConfiguration()
.Destructure.FSharpTypes()
.WriteTo.Console(Serilog.Formatting.Json.JsonFormatter())
.CreateLogger()
type UnionData =
| Label of labelField:string
| Number of int
Log.Information("UnionData Label case {@label}", Label "Foo")
Log.Information("UnionData Number case {@number}", Number 42)
Log.Information("Result Ok case {@ok}", Ok "Bueno")
Log.Information("Result Error case {@error}", Error "Mal")
...and got this output
{"Timestamp":"2019-05-31T11:50:01.4639470-04:00","Level":"Information","MessageTemplate":"UnionData Label case {@label}","Properties":{"label":{"_typeTag":"Label","labelField":"Foo"}}}
{"Timestamp":"2019-05-31T11:50:01.4767652-04:00","Level":"Information","MessageTemplate":"UnionData Number case {@number}","Properties":{"number":{"_typeTag":"Number","Item":42}}}
{"Timestamp":"2019-05-31T11:50:01.4799127-04:00","Level":"Information","MessageTemplate":"Result Ok case {@ok}","Properties":{"ok":{"_typeTag":"Ok","ResultValue":"Bien"}}}
{"Timestamp":"2019-05-31T11:50:01.4807271-04:00","Level":"Information","MessageTemplate":"Result Error case {@error}","Properties":{"error":{"_typeTag":"Error","ErrorValue":"Mal"}}}
This same structure of struct-handling will hit struct options (valuesome/valuenone) as well.
I believe that all that needs to happen here is for #9 to be updated/finished and to upgrade to a more recent version of FSharp.Core (probably at least 4.6.2). Doing this will update the implementations of the FSharpType.Isxxxxx functions to return appropriate results for struct tuples, records, and unions. here's an example from the .net core FSI for 3.0 preview 7:
> let thing = ValueSome "ok";;
[<Struct>]
val thing : string voption = ValueSome "ok"
> let thingty = thing.GetType();;
val thingty : System.Type =
Microsoft.FSharp.Core.FSharpValueOption`1[System.String]
> FSharp.Reflection.FSharpType.IsUnion thingty;;
val it : bool = true
Thanks for the notes, @baronfel . This library's in need of some maintenance, if you or anyone following along are keen to jump in and modernize things the help would be appreciated. Cheers!
I was planning on doing just that in a couple days/over the weekend. Are you a maintainer here (I'm not sure if the destructurama org is part of serilog proper)?
I'm a maintainer though I'm not actively maintaining :-) ... I haven't touched F# in nearly 10 years, unfortunately
The FSharp.Core built-in
Result
type (defined here) is not destructured correctly:It seems it only runs
ToString
on it. I would expect this to be destructured the same way as other unions.