Closed jank324 closed 4 months ago
Should we try to stick with semantic versioning (from now on)? These features seem to be deserving a MINOR version.
Or that's something to consider after v1.0.0 :)
I agree, but I think this is something to consider after v1.0.0 (right now the leading "v0." is just meant to indicate a pre-release version like it does in Gymnasium). But the important question this raises is: When do we move to v1.0.0?
So there is one task left here ... nice! I think #100 is something for a v0.6.3
or v0.7.0
depending on how severely it introduces breaking changes if and when we do it. And then we can think about v1.0.0
.
I think v0.6.2
should become the paper reference release.
We can probably also skip the empty beam feature for this release.
Nevertheless, we should be sure that this release runs well with the tutorial before publishing it.
Wait for #117 to be merged
I think we should ship this release ASAP.
... and published! 🚀
ToDos for release 0.6.2
ParameterBeam
andParticleBeam
classes (see #86)Drift
andDipole
; Add R56 in horizontal and vertical correctors modelling (see #90)Refactorbeam.empty
(see #93)