Morning session peer code review

[kene-creator]

Great job so far🎉

• Properly organized code in the modules folder
• Project works as expected

Suggestion

I would suggest that you improve the efficiency of looping by using a forEach loop for better iteration.

[MuhmmdUsama]

Status: Approved :green_circle:

Hey @devMunyi :wave:

Great work on implementing the requirements. Your project is complete. :blush: There is nothing else to say about your project. :+1:

Highlights :1st_place_medal:

:heavy_check_mark: Descriptive Readme :heavy_check_mark: Following Linters ✔️ Following the Requirements

Optional :green_circle:

• write a project description in the head section in README File
• activate your Reset button to reset your todo list and local storage as shown in the image below

---

All the changes with optional tags are not crucial enough to prevent you from getting the approval, but we highly recommend that students consider these changes.

Cheers and Happy coding! :clap: :clap: :clap:

Feel free to leave any questions or comments in the PR thread if something is not 100% clear. Please, remember to tag me in your question so I can receive the notification.

Please, do not open a new Pull Request for re-reviews. You should use the same Pull Request submitted for the first review, either valid or invalid unless it is requested otherwise.

---

As described in the Code reviews limits policy you have a limited number of reviews per project (check the exact number in your Dashboard). If you think that the code review was not fair, you can request a second opinion using this form.