Open Billy10mm opened 6 years ago
For Python 2.7, time.sleep()
which has some strange implementation underneath. Your code does not hang with Python 3 however as threading in Python 3 is implemented with pure C. If you are bound to Python 2.7, dispatchEventQueue()
with empty argument will not block main thread:
...
def run(self):
self.connect()
while self.running:
time.sleep(0.1)
data = self.rfa.dispatchEventQueue()
...
UPDATE: for Python2.7, adding Lock
in both Pyrfa thread and main thread will also help.
from pyrfa import Pyrfa
from threading import Lock, Thread
import time
lock = Lock()
class Reuters(Thread):
def __init__(self):
self.rfa = Pyrfa()
self.running = True
self.sessions = ['Session1']
Thread.__init__(self, name='rfa')
def connect(self):
self.rfa.createConfigDb('pyrfa.cfg')
for session in self.sessions:
self.rfa.acquireSession(session)
self.rfa.createOMMConsumer()
self.rfa.login()
self.rfa.directoryRequest()
self.rfa.dictionaryRequest()
self.subscribe('EUR=')
def run(self):
self.connect()
while self.running:
lock.acquire()
data = self.rfa.dispatchEventQueue(100)
lock.release()
def subscribe(self, ric):
self.rfa.marketPriceRequest(ric)
r = Reuters()
r.start()
for x in range(0,5):
lock.acquire()
print('{:.6f}'.format(time.time()))
time.sleep(1)
lock.release()
r.running = False
dispatchEventQueue() can behave badly if I receive data but don't do anything with it. I'm not sure how else to describe this, but consider the following example code:
When I run the above on Python 2.7.15 (with optimizations enabled), the process hangs seemingly forever (it eventually does end, but it can take over 20 minutes). But if you simply add a
print data
immediately following the call to dispatchEventQueue(), then the software does not hang and ends in approximately 5 seconds as it should. If I change the call to dispatchEventQueue() and remove the blocking timeout as so,data = self.rfa.dispatchEventQueue()
, then I have no issues at all.