developit / htm

Hyperscript Tagged Markup: JSX alternative using standard tagged templates, with compiler support.
Apache License 2.0
8.73k stars 170 forks source link

different attribute handling in div/span etc. and svg #240

Open rozek opened 1 year ago

rozek commented 1 year ago

I am using "htm" with "preact" binding

When I'm using code like the following

render(html`
  <div  id=${false && 'id-1'} />
  <span id=${false && 'id-2'} />
  <svg  id=${false && 'id-3'}></svg>
  <svg  id=${true  && 'id-4'}></svg>
`, document.body)

"htm" handles the ids differently:

Is that the expected behaviour? I've also tested other attributes, always with the same result...

rozek commented 1 year ago

Strange...

the behaviour described above seems to depend on the kind of attribute: code like

render(html`
  <div id=${false && 'id'} class=${false && 'class'}
    style=${false && 'style'} custom=${false && 'custom'}></div>
`, document.body)

produces <div id="false"></div>.

Right now, it seems that the id attribute is treated in a special way...

As a consequence, I'll use the following code as a workaround from now on:

render(html`
  <div id=${props.id != null ? id : undefined}
    other=${(props.other != null) && props.other} ...
  ></div>
`, document.body)
developit commented 1 year ago

This is how Preact works - it is setting the id property, not the id attribute. When you assign a non-string value to a DOM reflected property like id, it will generally be cast to a string.

This is why youre seeing different behavior for style. The style property setter accepts a string, which it applies as style.cssText. This behavior is not available on SVGElements however, because many HTMLElement properties are not implemented by SVGElement and Preact will instead fall back to assigning your prop as an attribute.

rozek commented 1 year ago

Oh, good to know...

Thank you very much for this explanation!

kylebakerio commented 12 months ago

I'm not sure I understand this. But I think it may be related an issue I'm having...

If I want to dynamically set an <img src="${dynamicUri}"/>, I seem to get a random hanging "div" string in the parent somewhere, weird artifacts. It just feels like I can't use dynamic string content without breaking things. I find this really unpredictable behavior and it's turning me off of htm, which I otherwise find pretty exciting (I hate the idea of needing the compilation step with JSX and am trying to avoid that dependency).

What's going on here?

likewise,

<div class="miniboard-thumb" style="background-image: ${baseLayerThumb};"/>

produces

but if I use static style props (e.g. style="height: 100px"), it works as expected...

edit:

Ok, this seems to work:

            let baseLayerThumb = generateStageThumbnail(konvaStage);
            // console.log('baselayer', baseLayerThumb);
            let attr = {style:`background-image: url(${baseLayerThumb});`};

            return html`
                <div class="miniboard">
                    <div class="miniboard-thumb" ...${attr}>

this seems like a pretty basic, critical use case, and it's weird that it doesn't 'just work'. Is this really the way to do it, it can't be inline?

rschristian commented 12 months ago

produces

Looks like you forgot to wrap the output in a backtick, so GitHub tried to render it directly.

<div class="miniboard-thumb" style="background-image: ${baseLayerThumb};"/>

This works just fine, albeit once you add content to the div (else there would be nothing to apply that background-image to)

this seems like a pretty basic, critical use case, and it's weird that it doesn't 'just work'.

Can you provide a more full example? Do you have some build tooling stepping in here and causing issues? This does "just work".

cben commented 4 months ago

It shouldn't matter whether you extract an object ...${attr} or place it inline. I suspect the difference is that you forgot url() around it:

-style="background-image: ${baseLayerThumb};
+style="background-image: url(${baseLayerThumb});