Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
Yeah, this was a change that I regretfully had to make to support the .NET
Compact Framework. Several implementations of the CF do not support timeouts;
the
properties exist but accessing them causes an exception to occur.
A little more background - The 1.10 behavior was to initialize the read/write
timeout values to a 1 second if the provided transport object’s (SerialPort,
TcpClient) timeout was equal to Timeout.Infinte (-1). Obviously this won’t
work
for implementations of the CF which don’t support timeouts. I thought about
using
a preprocessor directive to only initialize default values when targeting the
CF
but by that time the default value initialization strategy started to bother me.
All other settings specific to the underlying transport are controllable by the
underlying object (e.g. SerialPort BaudRate). A user should expect to be able
to
create a SerialPort object, set a timeout value to Timeout.Infinite (-1), pass
it
to a ModbusMaster factory method and have those timeout values preserved.
Therefore I ended up deciding to make the change to put the onus of timeout
initialization on the user.
I should have been more up front about the breaking change. Hope this didn’t
cause you too much trouble.
Scott
Original comment by sja...@gmail.com
on 12 May 2009 at 11:46
Original comment by sja...@gmail.com
on 12 May 2009 at 11:47
Thanks for the explanation. I was able to find the problem by browsing the
source
code. This is an excellent project. Thanks again.
Original comment by nathan.t...@gmail.com
on 13 May 2009 at 12:45
Should Modbus.Modbus.DefaultTimeout be marked as obsolete as it is not used
anywhere?
This caused me some confusion until I read this posting.
Original comment by Daniel...@gmail.com
on 23 Oct 2009 at 5:26
Good idea, I will reactivate and fix.
Original comment by sja...@gmail.com
on 23 Oct 2009 at 8:34
Original comment by sja...@gmail.com
on 15 Nov 2009 at 6:24
So what exactly happened to this? Modbus.Modbus.DefaultTimeout is still
present... is this deprecated or did you continue using it? The obsolete
decorator is there but these comments are unclear...
Original comment by pugglewu...@gmail.com
on 2 Jul 2014 at 8:35
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
nathan.t...@gmail.com
on 12 May 2009 at 10:56