search

devoric / GeminiProChat

MIT License
1 stars 0 forks source link

**Engineer dispatched.** See details on the [Maige dashboard](https://maige.app). #7

Closed sgriggs3 closed 4 months ago

sgriggs3 commented 4 months ago
Engineer dispatched. See details on the Maige dashboard. Name Status Message Updated (UTC)
Fix Landing Page Design and Performance Issues ❌ Error (inspect) Errored Mar 14, 2024, 2:13 AM

Originally posted by @maige-app in https://github.com/sgriggs3/sgriggs3.github.io/issues/19#issuecomment-1996265057

codeautopilot[bot] commented 4 months ago

Potential solution

The solution involves a comprehensive approach to address the issues identified in the file-level reports. The plan includes verifying environment variables, optimizing external resources, improving client-side scripts, and ensuring proper error handling and performance best practices are implemented.

What is causing this bug?

The bug could be caused by a combination of factors:

  1. Incorrect environment variable settings, particularly process.env.OUTPUT, which could lead to the wrong adapter being used in astro.config.mjs.
  2. Performance issues related to the high maxOutputTokens in src/utils/openAI.ts and potential exposure of the apiKey.
  3. Client-side authentication checks in src/pages/index.astro that may block rendering and lack error handling.
  4. Redundant and incorrect commands in the Dockerfile and hack/docker-entrypoint.sh script that could lead to confusion or errors.
  5. Unset or placeholder environment variables in docker-compose.yml that are crucial for the application's functionality.

Code

To address these issues, the following code changes are recommended:

  1. Ensure process.env.OUTPUT is set correctly for the deployment environment in astro.config.mjs.
  2. Reduce maxOutputTokens to a reasonable number and secure the apiKey in src/utils/openAI.ts.
  3. Move the authentication check to the server side and add error handling in src/pages/index.astro.
  4. Remove the redundant COPY hack ./ command from the Dockerfile.
  5. Replace placeholder values with actual environment variables in docker-compose.yml.

How to replicate the bug

To replicate the bug, one would need to set up the environment with the same incorrect or placeholder configurations as mentioned in the reports. This includes setting the wrong process.env.OUTPUT, using a high maxOutputTokens value, exposing the apiKey, performing client-side authentication without error handling, and running the Docker setup with placeholder environment variables.

Task

The task involves implementing the recommended code changes and ensuring that all configurations are correct and optimized for performance. This includes:

Click here to create a Pull Request with the proposed solution

Files used for this task:

Changes on astro.config.mjs After reviewing the `astro.config.mjs` file, here are some observations and potential areas that could be related to the reported error: 1. **Environment-Specific Adapters**: The `envAdapter` function is used to determine which adapter to use based on the `process.env.OUTPUT` environment variable. If this variable is not set correctly in the deployment environment, the wrong adapter might be used, which could lead to errors. It's important to ensure that the environment variable is set correctly for Vercel or Netlify, or that the default node adapter is suitable for the deployment. 2. **Progressive Web App (PWA) Configuration**: The `AstroPWA` integration is configured with certain options such as `autoUpdate`, `injectRegister`, and `periodicSyncForUpdates`. If there are issues with the service worker or the PWA manifest, it could potentially cause performance issues or errors. It's worth verifying that the PWA settings are correct and that the icons and manifest are properly served. 3. **Vite Plugins**: The `vite` configuration conditionally applies the `disableBlocks` plugin based on the `process.env.OUTPUT` variable. If this plugin is not functioning as expected or if it's incorrectly applied, it could lead to errors during the build or runtime. It's important to check that this plugin is necessary and working correctly. 4. **Output Mode**: The `output` is set to `'server'`, which means the build will be optimized for a Node.js server environment. If the deployment target does not support this mode, it could cause errors. Ensure that the deployment environment is compatible with the server output mode. 5. **General Configuration**: There are no obvious misconfigurations in the provided code snippet. However, it's possible that there are other parts of the configuration that are not shown here that could be causing issues. It's important to review the entire configuration file and related documentation to ensure all settings are correct. In conclusion, while there are no explicit errors in the provided `astro.config.mjs` file, it's important to verify that the environment variables, PWA settings, and Vite plugins are correctly configured and compatible with the deployment environment. Additionally, ensure that the output mode is suitable for the server where the application is hosted. If the issue persists, further investigation into other files and settings may be necessary.
Changes on src/utils/openAI.ts Upon reviewing the `src/utils/openAI.ts` file, here are some observations and potential issues that could be related to the performance of the landing page: 1. **API Key Exposure**: The `apiKey` is being imported from `import.meta.env.GEMINI_API_KEY`. It's important to ensure that this key is not exposed to the client-side, as it should remain confidential. If the key is exposed, it could lead to unauthorized usage and potential performance issues due to rate limiting or abuse. 2. **API Base URL Handling**: The `apiBaseUrl` is being sanitized by trimming and removing trailing slashes. This is good practice to avoid issues with URL construction. However, it's important to ensure that the `API_BASE_URL` is correctly configured in the environment variables. 3. **Generative Model Configuration**: The `startChatAndSendMessageStream` function initializes a chat with the Google Generative AI model `gemini-pro`. The configuration includes a `maxOutputTokens` of 8000, which is quite high. This could potentially lead to performance issues if the AI generates a large amount of text, as it could take a significant amount of time to process and stream back to the client. 4. **Safety Settings**: The safety settings are configured with `BLOCK_NONE` for various harmful content categories. While this may not directly impact performance, it's important to consider the implications of not filtering potentially harmful content, which could lead to legal or reputational issues. 5. **Streaming Responses**: The `sendMessageStream` function is used to stream responses. This is generally a good approach for performance, as it allows for data to be sent in chunks rather than waiting for the entire response. However, it's crucial to ensure that the streaming is handled efficiently on the client-side to prevent bottlenecks or memory issues. 6. **ReadableStream Usage**: The `ReadableStream` is used to encode and enqueue chunks of text from the AI model's response. It's important to ensure that this stream is properly consumed and closed on the client-side to avoid memory leaks or performance degradation. 7. **Error Handling**: There is no explicit error handling in the provided code. If the AI service fails or there are network issues, the lack of error handling could result in unhandled promise rejections or other errors that could impact the landing page's performance. 8. **Dependency on External Service**: The performance of the landing page is inherently tied to the performance of the external AI service. If the service is slow or down, it could directly impact the landing page's performance. In conclusion, while the code itself does not have any obvious bugs that would cause performance issues, the configuration and usage of the AI model could potentially lead to performance degradation if not handled properly. It's important to ensure that the AI interactions are efficient, that the API key is secure, and that there is proper error handling in place. Additionally, monitoring the performance of the external AI service is crucial, as it can have a direct impact on the landing page's performance.
Changes on src/pages/index.astro Upon reviewing the `src/pages/index.astro` file, here are some observations and potential areas that could be causing the design and performance issues reported in the ticket: 1. **Client-side Authentication Check**: The script at the bottom of the file is performing a client-side authentication check using `localStorage` and a fetch request to an API endpoint. This could potentially block rendering if the network request takes a long time to complete or fails. It's also a security concern because client-side checks can be bypassed. 2. **External CSS Imports**: The file imports external CSS files (`message.css`, `katex.min.css`, and `highlight.js` styles). If these files are large or hosted on slow servers, they could impact the page load performance. It's important to ensure that these files are minified and served from a fast CDN or optimized for quick loading. 3. **Component Loading**: The `` component is being loaded on the client side. If this component is heavy or does a lot of work on initialization, it could contribute to performance issues. It's worth investigating what this component does and whether it can be optimized or lazy-loaded. 4. **Lack of Error Handling**: The authentication check script does not handle network errors or cases where the response is not JSON. This could lead to unhandled promise rejections or JavaScript errors that might affect the page's functionality. 5. **Potential for Blocking Main Thread**: The authentication check is an asynchronous operation, but if the `fetch` call or subsequent operations are computationally expensive, they could block the main thread and affect the page's interactivity. 6. **No Performance Optimizations**: There are no apparent performance optimizations in the script, such as using `requestIdleCallback` or `requestAnimationFrame` to defer non-critical operations until the browser is idle. 7. **No Service Worker**: There is no mention of a service worker in this file, which could be used to cache assets and improve load times on repeat visits. 8. **No Preloading or Prefetching**: There are no `` or `` directives to instruct the browser to load important resources ahead of time. To address these issues, the following steps could be taken: - **Optimize External CSS**: Ensure that all external CSS files are minified and, if possible, combined into a single file to reduce HTTP requests. Use a CDN to serve these files if they are not already hosted on one. - **Review `` Component**: Investigate the `` component to see if it can be optimized for performance. Consider lazy-loading the component if it's not immediately necessary for the initial render. - **Improve Authentication Script**: Move the authentication check to the server side if possible. If it must remain on the client side, add proper error handling and consider deferring the check until after the page has loaded to avoid blocking rendering. - **Implement Performance Best Practices**: Use browser APIs like `requestIdleCallback` to defer non-critical operations and avoid blocking the main thread. - **Add Service Worker**: Implement a service worker to cache assets and improve load times for repeat visits. - **Use Preloading and Prefetching**: Add `` or `` directives for critical assets to improve load performance. In conclusion, while there are no glaring syntax errors in the `src/pages/index.astro` file, there are several areas where performance and design could be improved, particularly around external resource loading and the client-side authentication check. Implementing the suggested optimizations could help resolve the reported error.
Changes on src/message.css Upon reviewing the provided `src/message.css` file, the CSS rules seem to be relatively simple and straightforward. There are no obvious performance issues such as large background images, excessive use of box-shadows, or complex selectors that could cause reflow or repaint issues in the browser. However, there are a few points to consider that could potentially improve the design consistency and performance: 1. **Font Size Consistency**: The font size is set to `0.8rem` for both the `pre` element and the `table`. This is consistent, but depending on the overall design, it might be too small and could affect readability. It's worth checking if this font size aligns with the design requirements. 2. **Color Transparency**: The background colors use an alpha channel (`#64748b10` and `#64748b40`). While this is not a performance issue, it's important to ensure that the transparency effect is consistent with the design and that the text is readable on all possible background colors that might show through. 3. **Padding and Spacing**: Padding is consistently applied to `pre`, `th`, and `td` elements. However, it's important to verify that this spacing is consistent with the overall design and doesn't cause any layout issues on different screen sizes. 4. **Border Usage**: The last table row has a `border-bottom` applied. This should be checked to ensure it's consistent with the design and doesn't cause any unexpected visual issues. 5. **Use of Classes**: The CSS is scoped to elements within a `.message` class. It's important to ensure that this class is used correctly in the HTML to apply the styles as intended. 6. **CSS Minification**: While not directly related to the content of the CSS, ensuring that the CSS file is minified before being served can improve load performance. This should be part of the build process. 7. **Unused Styles**: It's not possible to tell from this file alone, but if there are styles defined that are not used anywhere in the markup, they should be removed to keep the CSS lean. 8. **Media Queries**: There are no media queries in this CSS snippet. If the landing page needs to be responsive, media queries should be used to ensure the design adapts to different screen sizes. 9. **CSS Validation**: Running the CSS through a validator can help catch any potential errors or compatibility issues. In conclusion, the `src/message.css` file does not appear to have any glaring issues that would cause design or performance problems. However, without the context of the rest of the codebase and the actual design requirements, it's difficult to make a definitive judgment. It's recommended to review the design implementation in the context of the entire landing page and test the page's performance using tools like Google PageSpeed Insights or Lighthouse to identify any specific issues.
Changes on hack/docker-entrypoint.sh Upon reviewing the `hack/docker-entrypoint.sh` script, there are a few observations and potential issues that could be related to the landing page error: 1. **Missing Shebang Consistency**: The script starts with `#!/bin/sh` which indicates that it should be run with `sh`. However, it uses `function` keyword which is not POSIX compliant and might not work with `sh` on some systems. It is more commonly used in `bash`. To ensure compatibility, it might be better to use `#!/bin/bash` if `bash` specific features are being used. 2. **Error Handling**: The script lacks error handling for the commands it runs. If the `./docker-env-replace.sh` script or the `node dist/server/entry.mjs` command fails, the script will continue to run as if nothing happened. It would be better to check the exit status of these commands and exit the script with an error code if something goes wrong. 3. **Infinite Loop**: The `while [ true ]; do` loop is an infinite loop that keeps the script running. This is not necessarily an issue, but it's worth noting that if the `node dist/server/entry.mjs` process exits for any reason, the script will continue to run and do nothing but sleep. It might be more robust to check if the subprocess is still running and exit if it's not. 4. **Signal Trapping**: The script traps `SIGTERM` and `SIGINT` signals to run the `cleanup` function. This is good practice, but it might be worth checking if the `cleanup` function should also handle other signals or if there are any other resources that need to be cleaned up. 5. **Subprocess Management**: The script starts a subprocess with `eval "$sub_service_command &"` and stores its PID. It's important to ensure that `node dist/server/entry.mjs` is a long-running process and doesn't exit immediately, otherwise, the PID stored will not be valid, and the `cleanup` function will not be able to terminate it. 6. **Quote Usage**: Variables are not quoted in the `kill` command. It's a good practice to quote variables to prevent word splitting and globbing issues: `kill -TERM "$sub_service_pid"`. 7. **Script Permissions**: Not directly observable from the content, but the script file should have the executable permission set (`chmod +x hack/docker-entrypoint.sh`) to be runnable. 8. **Docker Context**: Since this script is part of a Docker entrypoint, it's important to ensure that the Docker environment is correctly set up for the script to run. This includes the correct mounting of volumes, setting up environment variables, and ensuring that the `node dist/server/entry.mjs` file exists and is executable within the container. Based on the provided information, there are no direct indications that this script is causing the landing page error. However, the lack of error handling and the assumption that the `node` process will always be running could potentially lead to issues if the `node` process crashes or fails to start. It would be advisable to add error handling and process monitoring to the script to ensure that it can respond appropriately to failures.
Changes on Dockerfile Upon reviewing the provided Dockerfile, the goal is to ensure that it sets up the environment correctly for the landing page. Here's an analysis of the Dockerfile: 1. **Base Image**: The Dockerfile uses `node:18.15-alpine` as the base image, which is a lightweight version of Node.js and is suitable for production environments. This is a good choice for performance. 2. **Working Directory**: The `WORKDIR` is set to `/usr/src`, which is a standard location for source code within a container. 3. **Copying Files**: The `COPY . .` command copies all files from the current directory on the host into the working directory of the container. This is fine as long as the context of the Docker build does not include unnecessary files that could bloat the image size. 4. **Global Dependencies**: The Dockerfile installs `pnpm` globally using `npm install -g pnpm`. This is acceptable, although it's worth noting that `pnpm` could also be installed as a local dependency to avoid potential conflicts with other projects that may use different package managers. 5. **Project Dependencies**: The `RUN pnpm install` command installs the project dependencies. This is standard practice. 6. **Build the Project**: The `RUN pnpm run build` command builds the project. This is necessary to compile the project for production. 7. **Copying the hack Directory**: The `COPY hack ./` command is intended to copy the `hack` directory to the container. However, this command is redundant and incorrect because the `COPY . .` command earlier would have already copied the `hack` directory along with all other files. This line should be removed to avoid confusion and potential overwriting of files. 8. **Environment Variables**: The environment variables are set correctly, with `HOST` and `PORT` configured to allow external access, and `NODE_ENV` set to `production` for an optimized build. `LANG=C.UTF-8` is set to ensure proper character encoding. 9. **Expose Port**: The `EXPOSE $PORT` command is correct and exposes the port that the application runs on. 10. **Entrypoint Script**: The `RUN chmod +x ./docker-entrypoint.sh` command makes the entrypoint script executable, which is necessary. The `CMD ["/bin/sh", "docker-entrypoint.sh"]` command correctly sets the container to run the entrypoint script when it starts. ### Recommendations: - Remove the redundant `COPY hack ./` command since it's unnecessary and could lead to confusion or errors. - Ensure that the `.dockerignore` file is properly set up to exclude unnecessary files from being copied into the Docker image to reduce image size and build time. - Verify that the `docker-entrypoint.sh` script does not contain any errors or misconfigurations that could affect the landing page's performance or cause the reported error. Overall, the Dockerfile seems to be correctly set up for the landing page environment with the exception of the redundant `hack` directory copy command. It's important to check the actual contents of the `docker-entrypoint.sh` script and the `.dockerignore` file for potential improvements or issues.
Changes on docker-compose.yml The `docker-compose.yml` file provided is used to define and run multi-container Docker applications. In this context, it specifies the configuration for a service named `geminiprochat`. Here's an analysis of the file: 1. **Version**: The version '3' is used, which is a valid and widely used version of the Docker Compose file format. 2. **Services**: Only one service is defined, `geminiprochat`, which seems to be the main application. 3. **Build Context**: The `build: .` directive tells Docker to build an image from the Dockerfile in the current directory. This is standard usage. 4. **Container Name**: The `container_name: geminiprochat` directive specifies a custom container name. This is fine and helps in identifying the container easily. 5. **Restart Policy**: The `restart: always` directive ensures that the container will always restart unless it is explicitly stopped. This is useful for ensuring high availability. 6. **Ports**: The `ports` directive maps port 3000 of the host to port 3000 of the container, which is standard for web applications. 7. **Environment Variables**: Several environment variables are commented out, and one is set to a placeholder value (`GEMINI_API_KEY=YOUR_GEMINI_API_KEY`). These variables are likely necessary for the application to function correctly. Based on the provided information, here are some potential issues and recommendations: - **Environment Variables**: The environment variables are placeholders and need to be replaced with actual values for the application to work correctly. If these variables are not set, the application might not be able to access necessary external services or APIs, which could lead to errors. - **Commented Out Variables**: If any of the commented-out environment variables are required for the application to function (e.g., `API_BASE_URL`, `OPENAI_API_MODEL`), they need to be uncommented and set to the correct values. - **Performance**: There is no direct indication of performance-related configuration in this file. However, if the application requires a lot of resources, you might need to specify resource limits or reservations to ensure that the container does not consume excessive system resources. - **Network Configuration**: There is no explicit network configuration in this file. If the application needs to communicate with other services or has specific networking requirements, you might need to define a network and configure it accordingly. - **Volumes**: There are no volumes defined. If the application needs to persist data or share data between the host and the container, you will need to define volumes. - **Dependency Services**: If the application depends on other services (like a database or external API), those services need to be defined in this file as well, unless they are hosted elsewhere. In conclusion, the `docker-compose.yml` file seems to be a basic configuration without any obvious misconfigurations. However, the environment variables need to be set to actual values for the application to function properly. There is no direct evidence in this file that would explain design or performance issues on the landing page. If the application's error is related to missing or incorrect environment variables, updating them with the correct values should be the first step in resolving the issue.