Open devrandom opened 3 years ago
Thanks. I'll test and report back.
Unfortunately this does not work when checking out a commit or a branch, since git describe --tags
may return different result after added the new tag.
Ideally we should avoid adding tags. I'll take a look to see how to fix it.
GIT-DESCRIBE(1) Git Manual GIT-DESCRIBE(1)
NAME
git-describe - Describe a commit using the most recent tag reachable from it
SYNOPSIS
git describe [--all] [--tags] [--contains] [--abbrev=<n>] [<commit-ish>...]
git describe [--all] [--tags] [--contains] [--abbrev=<n>] --dirty[=<mark>]
DESCRIPTION
The command finds the most recent tag that is reachable from a commit.
If the tag points to the commit, then only the tag is shown. Otherwise, it suffixes
the tag name with the number of additional commits on top of the tagged
object and the abbreviated object name of the most recent commit.
By default (without --all or --tags) git describe only shows annotated tags.
For more information about creating annotated tags see the -a and -s options
to git-tag(1).
...
--tags
Instead of using only the annotated tags, use any tag found in refs/tags
namespace. This option enables matching a lightweight (non-annotated) tag.
...
It turns out that
Apparently we can't have both. Perhaps a better approach is to define a new option, e.g. --fetch-all
, so that everyone would be happier?
@dongcarl @abitmore - here's yet another improvement to #238, naming the local tag the same as the ref that was requested on the command line. This play better with
git describe --tags
.Review / test would be welcome.
Fixes #243.