Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
+1 Me too! ;)
httpfox is great for debugging ... but i don't like to have 2 applications
(firefox +
thunderbird) installed - I prefer the all-in-one suite.
I can get httpfox to load in seamonkey with a modified "install.rdf" but it
did't
show up in the statusbar. I think this is "only" a little problem with the XUL
file
or so - this should'n be to difficult to fix.
Original comment by HeadCras...@gmail.com
on 23 Jan 2010 at 5:12
Hi Headcrash,
me also could install it in Seamonkey after editing the install.rdf.
Now I found out that you simply can call
chrome://httpfox/content/HttpFoxWindow.xul
to open httpfox interface in a window/tab.
Thats a workaround to use httpfox within seamonkey.
Original comment by tommoos...@gmail.com
on 31 Mar 2010 at 4:52
[deleted comment]
+1 add me to the list. I'd like to see Httpfox support installing in SeaMonkey
2.x,
even if "as is" without formal support.
Original comment by fcas...@gmail.com
on 20 Apr 2010 at 7:10
You can add this (taken from AdBlock Plus) to your unzipped install.rdf from the
httpfox.xpi:
<em:targetApplication>
<!-- SeaMonkey -->
<Description>
<em:id>{92650c4d-4b8e-4d2a-b7eb-24ecf4f6b63a}</em:id>
<em:minVersion>2.0</em:minVersion>
<em:maxVersion>2.1a1pre</em:maxVersion>
</Description>
</em:targetApplication>
@tommoosach
Thanks for the chrome link, works very well for me :).
Lets rename httpfox to httpseafox :-p
Original comment by HeadCras...@gmail.com
on 20 Apr 2010 at 7:37
Original comment by pappkame...@gmail.com
on 24 Apr 2010 at 8:52
version 0.8.6 is compatible with seamonkey 2.x
Original comment by pappkame...@gmail.com
on 26 Apr 2010 at 5:35
This is great news, thanks !
Original comment by ovit.res...@gmail.com
on 21 May 2010 at 8:36
SeaMonkey is now in version 2.4.x
Could you upgrade compatibility ?
Original comment by ovit.res...@gmail.com
on 13 Oct 2011 at 11:42
SeaMonkey is now 2.9.1, please upgrade the max version compatibility string
Original comment by ovit.res...@gmail.com
on 9 May 2012 at 3:09
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
tommoos...@gmail.com
on 11 Dec 2009 at 2:01