devurmel / morelinq

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/morelinq
Apache License 2.0
0 stars 0 forks source link

Project is not signed #77

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. import package via nuget
2. try to build in project that is com visible
3. read error that says MoreLinq does not have a stron gname.

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
i expect it to just work

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
1.0

Please provide any additional information below.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by steve.go...@gmail.com on 21 Nov 2012 at 10:50

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Assembly in NuGet package is signed, as can be seen here:

>nuget install morelinq -Pre
'morelinq 1.0.15416-beta' already installed.

>sn -Tp morelinq.1.0.15416-beta\lib\net35\MoreLinq.dll

Microsoft (R) .NET Framework Strong Name Utility  Version 4.0.30319.17929
Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation.  All rights reserved.

Public key (hash algorithm: sha1):
0024000004800000940000000602000000240000525341310004000001000100290a359c9159ca
9f82c3d03a0d0f3e3475193a03396eef81aa8704db25c9e06507f28326ddf2f74671ca6a906ab2
fc560dbac02e0ddabff53872ba3d6b609735f4c9ba4cba88c6bbca1ede2f78d4b473be3fac627b
1faa700656d13aaf946eb6738a299c0001d5fe2ae0c0ef79843fc84460bb2de8855938d622dcd4
8bbcdbd5

Public key token is 384d532d7e88985d

I cannot reproduce this issue with the supplied steps.

Original comment by azizatif on 21 Nov 2012 at 11:18

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
i wasn't using pre release. And was able to verify that MoreLiq.dll in not 
prerelease does not represent a strongly named assembly. 

Original comment by steve.go...@gmail.com on 21 Nov 2012 at 11:40

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Yes, that's correct but the initial package[1] was published independently and 
was also marked beta. The latest pre-release[2] should be at least as stable.

[1] http://nuget.org/packages/morelinq/1.0
[2] http://nuget.org/packages/morelinq/1.0.15416-beta

Original comment by azizatif on 22 Nov 2012 at 6:51

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
yeah i thought it was silly to have a beta package in the non prerelease 
channel. Any chance of updating the non prerelease package? I just grabbed the 
code for the one method i wanted to use so it's not a big deal or anything just 
curious.

Original comment by steve.go...@gmail.com on 22 Nov 2012 at 8:09

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
> Any chance of updating the non prerelease package?
The idea is to go 1.0 release when I've had the chance to review and merge the 
following:
http://code.google.com/r/azizatif-morelinq-evenmore/

Original comment by azizatif on 22 Nov 2012 at 9:32