Closed mattijsf closed 8 years ago
Hi @mattijsf!
Why I chose then
instead of with
is to avoid name conflicts. Because with()
is more general than then()
. That means, other frameworks might have with()
already.
Okay! Sounds like you already gave it a thought :)
Nice idea!
I personally suggest a different keyword:
.with { ... }
Makes a bit more sense.
The keword/idea reminds me a bit of the old VB's
With...End With
statement: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/wc500chb.aspx