Open DanniB opened 7 years ago
or possibly ng-busy ?? that follows what many others have done.
The ng-suffix refers to AngularJS (1.x version). I think ngx would be a better fit.
I agree with @DanniB.
Thanks for your suggestions! ngx-busy would be great. Sadly, this name has been occupied on npm. (That package is empty and the version is 0.0.0.). I've emailed the publisher to request the ownership. Waiting for the resolution.
@devyumao: Can you proclaim any progress concerning the issue (answer from publisher)?
@devyumao Any update from publisher? Could get a bunch of people to write him an email since he's just sitting on it v0.0.0 with no code available. Don't want to over step, but I'm happy to write the publisher as well to see if multiple requests are more motivating.
The github repository ngx-busy
doesn't appear to be taken. If you grab that repo and clone to it for future updates and redirect to it from this one, then post to npm as @ngx-busy
it would be redundant using @ and ngx, but work until we can get the publisher of ngx-busy to release it, and if they don't it's still more transparent then angular2-busy
. Or, I noticed some repos are not hyphenated like ngxerrors so could use ngxbusy
for both npm and repo.
Angular has been upgraded from version 2 to 4. Still, this library is called angular2-busy. I anticipate transparency issues going forward.