Summarized Feedback for ICRC-21

[frederikrothenberger]

Quick summary of the feedback received across different channels:

General

• [x] Prefix all candid methods and types with icrc21_
  • addressed in #39
• [x] Gradual roll-out support proposed in #36
• [x] Introduce icrc21_supported_standards method for extensions to consent messages?
  • addressed in #40

If anything is missing, please add a comment and I'll add it to the list.

[sea-snake]

Is it right to assume that ICRC canisters would return ICRC-21 in the supported standards call?

[frederikrothenberger]

@sea-snake: Which standards call are you referring to? I think we might need an icrc21_supported_standards method in order to have ICRC-21 be extensible...

[sea-snake]

@sea-snake: Which standards call are you referring to? I think we might need an icrc21_supported_standards method in order to have ICRC-21 be extensible...

I was thinking for example ICRC-1 and 7 but since ICRC-21 doesn't really extend those standards, it makes more sense to have a icrc21_supported_standards indeed.

[frederikrothenberger]

@sea-snake: See #40

[frederikrothenberger]

Summary of decisions made in September 5 working group session.

• Agreement on all proposed changes
  • The changes have been merged into the draft.