Closed dnarayanan closed 6 years ago
update:
i had in my notes that the last time i had python-fsps
installed was on hash
[desika.narayanan@dev1 python-fsps]$ git rev-parse HEAD
85958a61264c9f03aedc69371931b0521bfcefc5
I tried this hash out, and it installed
It's strange that 85958a6126 works but not the most recent hash. The only change to relevant files was the tabular SFH with metallicity option, and no call signatures or anything else important was changed, and the build tests passed (though with numpy 1.11).
When using the older hash did you still have to comment out the
from fsps import __version__
line in setup.py
? This seems like somehow the build logic has gotten borked. I don't know too much about that stuff, any idea what might be the issue @dfm?
oh wait, this line in your install log seems important:
Running f2py on ['fsps.f90'] with flags ['-m', '_fsps', '-h', 'fsps.pyf', '--overwrite-signature']
IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'fsps.f90'. Skipping file "fsps.f90".
I don't see anything like that when I run setup.py install
. fsps.f90 is kind of important!
huh that's weird! i clobbered the directory that wasn't working, and now can't reproduce the problem. sigh...oh well. i'll close for now, and reopen if i end up in the same boat downstream. thanks for the help!
Hey All,
I'm trying a fresh install of
python-fsps
on a cluster where I've had it working for some time. This is the latest git hash of bothfsps
andpython-fsps
using python2.7.and
fsps
was compiled with:where I (think?)
fsps
is installed correctly?if I try to install
python-fsps
out of the box, I get an error on line 89 ofsetup.py
:since that line doesn't seem consequential (I think?), if I comment out lines 89 and 101 in
setup.py
, I can move the error forward to:Reading through the previous issues, this smells possibly of an
f2py
issue, or anumpy
issue, though I can't seem to figure out what that might be -- has anyone seen an issue like this before?(just to be sure: