This slight change is enough to work around the numerical instabilities encountered for the nitrogen STO basis of the mio example. In fact, it is even closer to the geometric series (0.5000 1.2051 2.9044 7.0000) suggested by skexp.
Difference to the original slateratom binary (+original exponents), as reported by skdiff:
This slight change is enough to work around the numerical instabilities encountered for the nitrogen STO basis of the mio example. In fact, it is even closer to the geometric series
(0.5000 1.2051 2.9044 7.0000)
suggested byskexp
.Difference to the original
slateratom
binary (+original exponents), as reported byskdiff
:Difference to the original
slateratom
binary (+updated exponents), as reported byskdiff
:Closes #92 (not really a fix though).