Closed robertodr closed 6 years ago
I support it. MPLv2.0 is two-way remixable but probably simpler with regards to re-linking requirement. We will however need support from all past contributors.
I'm fine with the mplv2.
Ulf On Thu, 27 Apr 2017 at 12:03, Roberto Di Remigio notifications@github.com wrote:
Ça va sans dire 😉 I think we need two steps:
- Open an issue asking for relicensing under MPLv2, like here https://github.com/zeromq/zyre/issues/327
- Create a paper trail in the repository like here https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/tree/master/RELICENSE
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/dftlibs/xcfun/issues/17#issuecomment-297670866, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMeumfgtwEejIQc62yjVyYDJc-oL9HBHks5r0GfsgaJpZM4NJ70- .
i'm fine with it too.
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 12:36 PM, Ulf Ekström notifications@github.com wrote:
I'm fine with the mplv2.
Ulf On Thu, 27 Apr 2017 at 12:03, Roberto Di Remigio <notifications@github.com
wrote:
Ça va sans dire 😉 I think we need two steps:
- Open an issue asking for relicensing under MPLv2, like here https://github.com/zeromq/zyre/issues/327
- Create a paper trail in the repository like here https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/tree/master/RELICENSE
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/dftlibs/xcfun/issues/17#issuecomment-297670866, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ AMeumfgtwEejIQc62yjVyYDJc-oL9HBHks5r0GfsgaJpZM4NJ70-
.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/dftlibs/xcfun/issues/17#issuecomment-297677680, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGyI9PV6b_yItG6rXoWz1cXCjBJchoo1ks5r0G_LgaJpZM4NJ70- .
I hereby agree to publish my contributions to XCFun under the MPLv2 license
I hereby agree to publish my contributions to XCFun under the MPLv2 license
I hereby agree to publish my contributions to XCFun under the MPLv2 license
On 27 Apr 2017, at 14:11, Roberto Di Remigio notifications@github.com wrote:
The project comes under the LGPL3.0+ https://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl-3.0.en.html with a Static Linking Exception (SLE) http://zeromq.org/area:licensing It could be worthwhile to re-license under MPLv2 https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/MPL/2.0/, since it has the SLE baked in and is a standard license.
This is the list of contributors according to git shortlog --summary --numbered
@ajborgoo https://github.com/ajborgoo @aspgomes https://github.com/aspgomes @chjacob-tubs https://github.com/chjacob-tubs Elisa Rebolini @juselius https://github.com/juselius @miroilias https://github.com/miroilias @bast https://github.com/bast @robertodr https://github.com/robertodr @sarahr https://github.com/sarahr @simensr https://github.com/simensr @uekstrom https://github.com/uekstrom Could you:
kindly reply "I hereby agree to publish my contributions to XCFun under the MPLv2 license"? Open a pull request to add a file in the RELICENSE subdirectory of the repository following this template https://github.com/robertodr/xcfun/blob/relicense/RELICENSE/relicense-template-mplv2.txt This action is needed in order to leave a "paper trail" of the relicensing (much like the relicensing process in DALTON/LSDALTON) If you have any objection to relicensing your contributions, explain your reasons
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/dftlibs/xcfun/issues/17, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ANas8bWvgTtzkRbJfJDEhKjbzLDzPaA8ks5r0IXngaJpZM4NJ70-.
I hereby agree to publish my contributions to XCFun under the MPLv2 license
I hereby agree to publish my contributions to XCFun under the MPLv2 license
I hereby agree to publish my contributions to XCFun under the MPLv2 license
@ajborgoo @chjacob-tubs @erebolini @juselius @miroi @sarahr @simensr @uekstrom You should now file a pull request to add a file like this to the repository. You can click on "Create new file", copy-paste the template and then submit. Please close the commit message with [ci skip], so that unnecessary CI builds are avoided. Thank you in advance!
I hereby agree to publish my contributions to XCFun under the MPLv2 license
Reminder for @ajborgoo @erebolini @juselius @sarahr @uekstrom
I hereby agree to publish my contributions to XCFun under the MPLv2 license
This issue has been open for a while and I would like to close it. If you haven't done so yet, I reiterate my request to @ajborgoo @erebolini @juselius @sarahr @uekstrom to reply to this issue and to generate a new file in the RELICENSE
folder following the template
RELICENSE
folder.Create new file
{{ name of company / name of individual }}
, {{github username}}
, {{github commit author}}
, {{name}}
, {{ Full Name }}
and {{ creation date of document (format: yyyy/mm/dd) }}
) with the correct content.NameSurname.md
.
[ci skip]
tag, so that CI jobs on Travis are not triggered.Thank you Robert for your excellent instructions! I have committed my file.
Regards, Ulf
2017-11-15 16:01 GMT+01:00 Roberto Di Remigio notifications@github.com:
This issue has been open for a while and I would like to close it. If you haven't done so yet, I reiterate my request to @ajborgoo https://github.com/ajborgoo @erebolini https://github.com/erebolini @juselius https://github.com/juselius @sarahr https://github.com/sarahr @uekstrom https://github.com/uekstrom to reply to this issue and to generate a new file in the RELICENSE folder following the template https://github.com/dftlibs/xcfun/blob/master/RELICENSE/relicense-template-mplv2.txt
- Go to https://github.com/dftlibs/xcfun
- Click on the RELICENSE folder.
- Click on Create new file [image: untitled] https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3708689/32841793-9a5e0dc6-ca1b-11e7-8dd1-70e26dd3c41a.png
- Copy-paste the template into the editor window and edit the placeholders ({{ name of company / name of individual }}, {{github username}}, {{github commit author}}, {{name}}, {{ Full Name }} and {{ creation date of document (format: yyyy/mm/dd) }}) with the correct content.
- The new file should be saved as NameSurname.md. [image: selection_001] https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3708689/32842617-d2f9c1be-ca1d-11e7-839f-65c5316faa14.png
- The commit message should state that the new file was created and should have the [ci skip] tag, so that CI jobs on Travis are not triggered.
- You can save the new file. This should automatically submit a pull request with your changes.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/dftlibs/xcfun/issues/17#issuecomment-344618630, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMeumRugixUN59N1NN6QFHkRr-yqB-UIks5s2vyFgaJpZM4NJ70- .
I hereby agree to publish my contributions to XCFun under the MPLv2 license
REMINDER
This issue has been open for a while and I would like to close it. If you haven't done so yet, I reiterate my request to @ajborgoo @erebolini to reply to this issue and to generate a new file in the RELICENSE
folder following the template
RELICENSE
folder.Create new file
{{ name of company / name of individual }}
, {{github username}}
, {{github commit author}}
, {{name}}
, {{ Full Name }}
and {{ creation date of document (format: yyyy/mm/dd) }}
) with the correct content.NameSurname.md
.
[ci skip]
tag, so that CI jobs on Travis are not triggered.@robertodr everybody is checked on top but I guess @ajborgoo is missing?
I did it just now. (I’ve tried to do this before.)
I didn’t get to choose between “Commit directly to master” or “Crete branch and start pull request” as described in step 5 of one of the previous e-mails. I managed to click the green button and I hope it’s done right this time.
Sorry for being so slow on this. A
On 4 Apr 2018, at 11:40, Radovan Bast notifications@github.com wrote:
@robertodr https://github.com/robertodr everybody is checked on top but I guess @ajborgoo https://github.com/ajborgoo is missing?
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/dftlibs/xcfun/issues/17#issuecomment-378541938, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ANas8VhdCHw5sEaVuMTfxaHvXliWoBYwks5tlJUXgaJpZM4NJ70-.
Now GitHub proposes to do a pull request. Should I do this, or has it been done automatically (as it said in the previous window?) A
On 4 Apr 2018, at 13:23, Alex Borgoo ajborgoo@gmail.com wrote:
I did it just now. (I’ve tried to do this before.)
I didn’t get to choose between “Commit directly to master” or “Crete branch and start pull request” as described in step 5 of one of the previous e-mails. I managed to click the green button and I hope it’s done right this time.
Sorry for being so slow on this. A
On 4 Apr 2018, at 11:40, Radovan Bast <notifications@github.com mailto:notifications@github.com> wrote:
@robertodr https://github.com/robertodr everybody is checked on top but I guess @ajborgoo https://github.com/ajborgoo is missing?
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/dftlibs/xcfun/issues/17#issuecomment-378541938, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ANas8VhdCHw5sEaVuMTfxaHvXliWoBYwks5tlJUXgaJpZM4NJ70-.
Thanks @ajborgoo and yes, go ahead with the PR.
The project comes under the LGPL3.0+ with a Static Linking Exception (SLE) It could be worthwhile to re-license under MPLv2, since it has the SLE baked in and is a standard license.
This is the list of contributors according to
git shortlog --summary --numbered
Could you:
RELICENSE
subdirectory of the repository following this template This action is needed in order to leave a "paper trail" of the relicensing (much like the relicensing process in DALTON/LSDALTON)If you have any objection to relicensing your contributions, explain your reasons