Closed cdlm closed 9 years ago
Hmm, I will have to think on this, I have thought a bit about separating clone and fork, and I think I agree that hub's approach is a good method for solving that. I also added code I had yet to use for adding named remotes to other forks, and I think this approach might dovetail better with that. Thank you for raising the issue I will give it some thought.
More a feature request / note than an issue…
The current behavior of forking-then-cloning-the-fork could be confusing for
hub
users.hub
has two separate commandshub clone user/repo
simply wrapsgit clone
, then you usehub fork
when you need to make a pull-request. You end up withorigin
pointing to the original project, and a branch named after your user pointing to your fork.