search

dgu123 / factplusplus

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/factplusplus
0 stars 0 forks source link

Data type reasoning crashes reasoner #10

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
I am trying to do datatype reasoning with Fact++ via OWLAPI and I have been
experiencing reasoner crashes.

To reproduce the problem simply run the program in DataTypeMinimalTestCase.java

The program should simply print the name of the individual that it creates
("ind"), but instead it crashes. I rebuilt FaCT++ using ENABLE_CHECKS and I
got the following output:

call initKernel from JNI
FaCT++.Kernel: Reasoner for the SROIQ(D) Description Logic
Copyright (C) Dmitry V. Tsarkov, 2002-2007. Version 1.1.10 (30 November 2007)
call getDataProperty from JNI
call getBuiltInDataType from JNI
call getDataValue from JNI
call getDataValue from JNI
call askInstances from JNI
java: DataReasoning.h:229: DataTypeAppearance&
DataTypeReasoner::getDTAbyType(const TDataEntry*): Assertion
`Map.find(dataType) != Map.end()' failed.

===CUT===

The stack trace at the assertion is:

#0  0x00002ae78185dcab in raise () from /lib/libc.so.6
#1  0x00002ae78185f660 in abort () from /lib/libc.so.6
#2  0x00002ae781857436 in __assert_fail () from /lib/libc.so.6
#3  0x00002aaaf29df409 in DataTypeReasoner::getDTAbyType
(this=0x2aaaf266e2b8, dataType=0x2aaaf2567c00) at DataReasoning.h:229
#4  0x00002aaaf29df479 in DataTypeReasoner::getDTAbyValue
(this=0x2aaaf266e2b8, dataValue=0x2aaaf24b0fe0) at DataReasoning.h:239
#5  0x00002aaaf29df4dc in DataTypeReasoner::processRestriction
(this=0x2aaaf266e2b8, pos=true, min=false, excl=false, c=0x2aaaf24b0fe0,
dep=@0x2aaaf25c4614) at DataReasoning.h:195
#6  0x00002aaaf29dd3bf in DataTypeReasoner::addDataEntry
(this=0x2aaaf266e2b8, c=@0x2aaaf25c4610) at DataReasoning.cpp:67
#7  0x00002aaaf299ff5b in DlSatTester::checkDataClash (this=0x2aaaf266e1c0,
Node=0x2aaaf25c4520) at Reasoner.cpp:247
#8  0x00002aaaf29bed1b in DlSatTester::setupEdge (this=0x2aaaf266e1c0,
pA=0x2aaaf266e560, curDep=@0x2aaaf266e4d4, flags=5) at Tactic.cpp:751
#9  0x00002aaaf29bff06 in DlSatTester::createNewEdge (this=0x2aaaf266e1c0,
Role=0x2aaaf25eea90, Concept=4, curDep=@0x2aaaf266e4d4, flags=5) at
Tactic.cpp:657
#10 0x00002aaaf29c1121 in DlSatTester::commonTacticBodySome
(this=0x2aaaf266e1c0, cur=@0x2aaaf25c4420) at Tactic.cpp:602
#11 0x00002aaaf29c1634 in DlSatTester::commonTacticBody
(this=0x2aaaf266e1c0, cur=@0x2aaaf25c4420) at Tactic.cpp:121
#12 0x00002aaaf29c180a in DlSatTester::commonTactic (this=0x2aaaf266e1c0)
at Tactic.cpp:67
#13 0x00002aaaf299fb4c in DlSatTester::checkSatisfiability
(this=0x2aaaf266e1c0) at Reasoner.cpp:522
#14 0x00002aaaf299fd98 in DlSatTester::runSat (this=0x2aaaf266e1c0) at
Reasoner.cpp:294
#15 0x00002aaaf2998e82 in DlSatTester::runSat (this=0x2aaaf266e1c0, p=2,
q=1) at Reasoner.h:772
#16 0x00002aaaf29a0404 in DlSatTester::createCache (this=0x2aaaf266e1c0,
p=2) at Reasoner.cpp:497
#17 0x00002aaaf29a0500 in DlSatTester::fillsCache (this=0x2aaaf266e1c0,
p=2) at Reasoner.cpp:397
#18 0x00002aaaf2977a5e in TBox::initCache (this=0x2aaaf25edec0,
pConcept=0x2aaaf25c4030) at Reasoner.h:1039
#19 0x00002aaaf298f017 in TBox::createTempConcept (this=0x2aaaf25edec0,
desc=0x2aaaf266e190) at dlTBox.cpp:264
#20 0x00002aaaf29baa33 in ReasoningKernel::setUpCache (this=0x2aaaf26340c0,
query=0x2aaaf266e190, level=ReasoningKernel::csClassified) at Kernel.cpp:169
#21 0x00002aaaf2984041 in
ReasoningKernel::getDescendants<JTaxonomyActor<IndividualPolicy> >
(this=0x2aaaf26340c0, C=0x2aaaf266e190, actor=@0x4022a850) at
../Kernel/Kernel.h:547
#22 0x00002aaaf298409a in
ReasoningKernel::getInstances<JTaxonomyActor<IndividualPolicy> >
(this=0x2aaaf26340c0, C=0x2aaaf266e190, actor=@0x4022a850) at
../Kernel/Kernel.h:647
#23 0x00002aaaf2962fa4 in
Java_uk_ac_manchester_cs_factplusplus_FaCTPlusPlus_askInstances
(env=0x40114190, obj=0x4022a958, arg=0x4022a950) at FaCTPlusPlus.cpp:1630

===CUT===

I am using FaCT++ 1.1.10 on 64bit linux. I built the C++ code myself from
scratch (which required a couple of tweaks to the build system because it
was not setup to build on 64bit). However I used the prebuilt jar for the
OWLAPI java code.

I am using OWLAPI 2.1.1.

This issue may be related to issue #9.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by arthur.peters on 25 Mar 2008 at 11:31

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
I included the wrong stack trace. Below is the correct one. Interestingly they 
appear
to be almost identical despite the fact that the ontologies resulting in them 
are
quite different.

#0  0x00002aedf733bcab in raise () from /lib/libc.so.6
#1  0x00002aedf733d660 in abort () from /lib/libc.so.6
#2  0x00002aedf7335436 in __assert_fail () from /lib/libc.so.6
#3  0x00002aaaf2980409 in DataTypeReasoner::getDTAbyType (this=0x2aaaf4158fa8,
dataType=0x2aaaf416d320) at DataReasoning.h:229
#4  0x00002aaaf2980479 in DataTypeReasoner::getDTAbyValue (this=0x2aaaf4158fa8,
dataValue=0x2aaaf417ba20) at DataReasoning.h:239
#5  0x00002aaaf29804dc in DataTypeReasoner::processRestriction 
(this=0x2aaaf4158fa8,
pos=true, min=false, excl=false, c=0x2aaaf417ba20, dep=@0x2aaaf418ee84) at
DataReasoning.h:195
#6  0x00002aaaf297e3bf in DataTypeReasoner::addDataEntry (this=0x2aaaf4158fa8,
c=@0x2aaaf418ee80) at DataReasoning.cpp:67
#7  0x00002aaaf2940f5b in DlSatTester::checkDataClash (this=0x2aaaf4158eb0,
Node=0x2aaaf418ed90) at Reasoner.cpp:247
#8  0x00002aaaf295fd1b in DlSatTester::setupEdge (this=0x2aaaf4158eb0,
pA=0x2aaaf417bc80, curDep=@0x2aaaf41591c4, flags=5) at Tactic.cpp:751
#9  0x00002aaaf2960f06 in DlSatTester::createNewEdge (this=0x2aaaf4158eb0,
Role=0x2aaaf411c8b0, Concept=4, curDep=@0x2aaaf41591c4, flags=5) at 
Tactic.cpp:657
#10 0x00002aaaf2962121 in DlSatTester::commonTacticBodySome 
(this=0x2aaaf4158eb0,
cur=@0x2aaaf418ec90) at Tactic.cpp:602
#11 0x00002aaaf2962634 in DlSatTester::commonTacticBody (this=0x2aaaf4158eb0,
cur=@0x2aaaf418ec90) at Tactic.cpp:121
#12 0x00002aaaf296280a in DlSatTester::commonTactic (this=0x2aaaf4158eb0) at
Tactic.cpp:67
#13 0x00002aaaf2940b4c in DlSatTester::checkSatisfiability 
(this=0x2aaaf4158eb0) at
Reasoner.cpp:522
#14 0x00002aaaf2940d98 in DlSatTester::runSat (this=0x2aaaf4158eb0) at 
Reasoner.cpp:294
#15 0x00002aaaf2939e82 in DlSatTester::runSat (this=0x2aaaf4158eb0, p=2, q=1) at
Reasoner.h:772
#16 0x00002aaaf2941404 in DlSatTester::createCache (this=0x2aaaf4158eb0, p=2) at
Reasoner.cpp:497
#17 0x00002aaaf2941500 in DlSatTester::fillsCache (this=0x2aaaf4158eb0, p=2) at
Reasoner.cpp:397
#18 0x00002aaaf2918a5e in TBox::initCache (this=0x2aaaf416ca20,
pConcept=0x2aaaf418e8a0) at Reasoner.h:1039
#19 0x00002aaaf2930017 in TBox::createTempConcept (this=0x2aaaf416ca20,
desc=0x2aaaf417bbb0) at dlTBox.cpp:264
#20 0x00002aaaf295ba33 in ReasoningKernel::setUpCache (this=0x2aaaf41630f0,
query=0x2aaaf417bbb0, level=ReasoningKernel::csClassified) at Kernel.cpp:169
#21 0x00002aaaf2925041 in
ReasoningKernel::getDescendants<JTaxonomyActor<IndividualPolicy> >
(this=0x2aaaf41630f0, C=0x2aaaf417bbb0, actor=@0x4022a960) at 
../Kernel/Kernel.h:547
#22 0x00002aaaf292509a in
ReasoningKernel::getInstances<JTaxonomyActor<IndividualPolicy> >
(this=0x2aaaf41630f0, C=0x2aaaf417bbb0, actor=@0x4022a960) at 
../Kernel/Kernel.h:647
#23 0x00002aaaf2903fa4 in
Java_uk_ac_manchester_cs_factplusplus_FaCTPlusPlus_askInstances (env=0x40114190,
obj=0x4022aa70, arg=0x4022aa68) at FaCTPlusPlus.cpp:1630

Original comment by arthur.peters on 26 Mar 2008 at 4:13

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
This problem appears to have been fixed in FaCT++ 1.1.11.

Thanks. 

PS: I don't seem to be allowed to close this issue. But it should be marked 
fixed.

Original comment by arthur.peters on 9 Apr 2008 at 7:51

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Closed as fixed.

Original comment by dmitry.t...@gmail.com on 9 Apr 2008 at 7:56