search

dgu123 / factplusplus

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/factplusplus
0 stars 0 forks source link

Feature Request: Support for Jena Reasoning API #3

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Are there any plans to provide a Jena compliant reasoning API (similar to
the Java OWL-API already provided resp. like Pellet does)? That would be
incredibly useful.

Cheers,
Herwig

Original issue reported on code.google.com by herwig.m...@gmail.com on 11 Jul 2007 at 11:53

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Our team has developed an Inference API, which is based on Jena and Pellet. Now 
we
found out that Pellet cannot handle our ontology, because it is too big for it. 
The
Fact++ reasoner, however, handles with it without any problem and extremely 
fast(I
was waiting for pellet to create an inference model for 5 hours on a 3GHz 
server with
2 GB RAM ... and it could not finish within this time ... Fact++ made the 
reasoning
for 30 seconds !!!!! Congratulations for that!!! ). My problem is that I will
probably have to rewrite the API because Fact++ cannot work with Jena! So I'm 
joining
the previous post ... will you make Jena support for Fact++?

Original comment by pinpino...@gmail.com on 1 Oct 2007 at 9:40

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
pinpinokio:
Did you write the API? Did you connect Jena with Fact++?

Original comment by xjar...@gmail.com on 29 Jul 2009 at 2:20

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Gopal:

When have you planned to release the Jena with Fact++ support.

Original comment by anand.s...@gmail.com on 19 May 2010 at 8:04

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Yeah I would love that too...

Original comment by dw4...@gmail.com on 25 Jul 2010 at 4:16

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
plus one for Jena support

Original comment by hjrnu...@gmail.com on 24 Sep 2010 at 11:17

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Jena uses triple-base OWL model, which is very different from the axiom-based 
model, which is used by FaCT++. Implementing Jena Reasoning API will require 
significant amount of effort and resources, which I do not have at the moment. 
I'll leave the issue open in case someone would like to pick this up but I am 
not planning to work on it at the moment.

Original comment by dmitry.t...@gmail.com on 8 Apr 2015 at 4:35