Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
Is there an argument for having a single MediaUpload type that can take any
io.Base/file-like object?
Original comment by afs...@google.com
on 14 Apr 2012 at 12:20
Since we are still targeting Python 2.5 and io.Base only appears in 2.6 and
later, io.Base support will have to be a feature, not the primary mechanism.
Original comment by jcgregorio@google.com
on 14 Apr 2012 at 12:38
Sorry, I meant you could use the intersection of interface between io.Base and
pre-2.6 file-like objects. They are quite similar.
Original comment by afs...@google.com
on 16 Apr 2012 at 5:01
[deleted comment]
I've hacked together slight modifications to HttpRequest and MediaFileUpload
for sending file objects without specifying their size upfront. Should I clean
this up and submit a revision to http.py?
Original comment by yova...@google.com
on 1 Jun 2012 at 10:33
This issue was closed by revision 8ae1f255521a.
Original comment by jcgregorio@google.com
on 12 Jun 2012 at 1:37
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
jcgregorio@google.com
on 13 Apr 2012 at 8:41