Open maggielee1111 opened 10 months ago
Hi @maggielee1111, sorry for the slow response. I think the PR is helpful because if anyone else is looking to run the code, it could save them a lot of time!
I am curious how different the results are. Perhaps we'll be able to see in the PR commit diffs.
Hi Daniel!
I just start a PR. I added some changes in 7-transform.ipynb like I mentioned in my last comment, and also replaced the result of transform with the result I got.
When I looked into the data, I found out the input I use primary-aurocs.tsv has a different value from summary_df = readr::read_tsv('data/auroc.tsv')
.
I guess that is the reason I got a different result.
Hi Daniel! Due to recent updates in R libraries, I've made several modifications to all-features/7-transform.ipynb and the result seems a little different. Following are the changes I made.
degree_transformer = to_fxn(params['degree_transformer'])
since I assumed the project is trying to evaluate transformation fordegree_df
too.funs
function to(across(everything()
due tofuns
being deprecated.Considering these outcomes, do you find the results acceptable? If so, I plan to initiate a pull request. I would appreciate any feedback or insights.