KVM support

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Have you planning support?
Maybe kvm-web-panel as separate project?...

Original issue reported on code.google.com by Y.ia...@gmail.com on 28 Nov 2010 at 6:13

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I had some thoughts about Xen support. But I don't use either KVM or Xen often 
and have no real needs to use them. I can't promise anything, but maybe I 
reconsider my plans later (or my needs can be changed).

Original comment by sibprogrammer on 29 Nov 2010 at 7:47

• Changed title: KVM support

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Please - we dont need another "focus on everything" but "nothing ist finished" 
Admin Panel.
Stay on OpenVZ for now - there's a lot of Tasks open.

Keep up this good Work.

Thanks,
Silvio

Original comment by silvio.e...@gmail.com on 3 Feb 2011 at 8:46

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Perhaps it would make more sense to support libvirt instead of KVM.   This 
would allow for an abstraction layer that would support lxc as well as KVM.

Original comment by pduboi...@gmail.com on 17 May 2011 at 2:22

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I agree with Silvio.

Original comment by axelge...@gmail.com on 13 Jul 2011 at 2:59

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by sibprogrammer on 20 Dec 2011 at 2:54

• Added labels: Milestone-Future

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Hello,

I actually think that the OVZ support is strong enough as is to think about 
supporting libvirt - KVM alone would be a waste of time i guess when libvirt 
supports almost everything...

What about a bounty?? How much do you think it could cost to develop that 
feature and how many people would be interested to pay?
I'd be interested for sure!

Regards,
-O.

Original comment by oliver.m...@gmail.com on 13 Jun 2012 at 4:29

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Yes I agree with Oliver.
The virtualization API (libvirt) would allow the project to become the ultimate 
Admin experience for managing virtual/paravirt/containers servers.

Original comment by mariusz....@gmail.com on 13 Nov 2012 at 11:18