Open diazrenata opened 4 years ago
WEIRD WEIRD WEIRD.
I tried computing the overlaps if you drop a mean somewhere in the body size range, sample all the individuals from the same normal distribution, and then assign them to species randomly with abundances according to the SAD.
And they're often pretty low!!!!
Just because you're sampling small numbers from a normal distribution.
So I don't know if this means...
Update uses sum abundance weighting. There's probably a better way (a low abundance species should be really bad bc there's no knowing what its real kde is)
New update uses product abundance weighting, which amplifies the downweighting of pairings that include low abundance species/upweighting of high abundance pairings. (but not in the ecdf????)
I also coerced a version with completely even abundances, and as expected this had higher overlap values. It's an issue with low sampling, low certainty, and extremely pointy kdes for the low-abundance species.
What do I want to know about this metric?