"""
The authors conclude that the presence of multiple strains confounds assembly, and that it still challenges the latest sequencing technologies. They also conclude that “mock” communities are crucial in evaluating metagenome tools. I found that the final paragraph (lines 481-498) is out of place and should either be expanded in an earlier section, or followed by a stronger conclusion.
"""
""" The authors conclude that the presence of multiple strains confounds assembly, and that it still challenges the latest sequencing technologies. They also conclude that “mock” communities are crucial in evaluating metagenome tools. I found that the final paragraph (lines 481-498) is out of place and should either be expanded in an earlier section, or followed by a stronger conclusion. """