related to #3, we have an opportunity to benchmark abundance calculations vs read mappings. should we? or does it confuse the message?
this could part of a different paper, too - perhaps something to do with strain-level detection and quantification. see below excerpt from e-mail to david koslicki -
I’m pretty confident that this approach can be used to do accurate strain-level resolution, based on the combinatorial analysis of the content of each strain’s accessory elements. That was a mouthful, but, basically, as long as each strain’s genome has a unique combination of k-mers (which each must, because otherwise it would be the same as another genome…) our approach can match metagenomes to it based on that unique combination.
related to #3, we have an opportunity to benchmark abundance calculations vs read mappings. should we? or does it confuse the message?
this could part of a different paper, too - perhaps something to do with strain-level detection and quantification. see below excerpt from e-mail to david koslicki -