Closed ctb closed 9 years ago
How about countgraph
& graph
?
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 07:38:02PM -0700, Michael R. Crusoe wrote:
How about
countgraph
&graph
?
Imprecise - wouldn't "graph" be a superset of "countgraph"? What about "nodegraph"?
We haven't really been using the 1-bit graph implementation lately, but we may well in the future, as well as expanding to additional kinds of graphs - exact graphs of various flavors, and different sized bins. So maybe we can think about that, too.
+1 for nodegraph + countgraph
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 07:43:39PM -0700, Michael R. Crusoe wrote:
+1 for nodegraph + countgraph
Excellent.
+1 node/countgraph as well
I am working on this issue. It's been postponed until after the python3 port to avoid merge conflicts.
I suggest counting_table and/or bytegraph instead of counting_hash, and bitgraph instead of hashbits. (@mr-c has already renamed stopped using 'hash' in our scripts and docs).
counting_table could default to bigcounts=yes, bytegraph could default to bigcounts=no, but otherwise be the same structure.
Reason: I found it silly to be using counting_hash in my VanBUG talk when I was talking about graphs.