Closed darcymason closed 2 years ago
Hello @darcymason! Thanks for updating this PR. We checked the lines you've touched for PEP 8 issues, and found:
There are currently no PEP 8 issues detected in this Pull Request. Cheers! :beers:
@darcymason Thanks for the comprehensive PR. Is this ready for review? Do you have any more commits to add?
@darcymason Thanks for the comprehensive PR. Is this ready for review? Do you have any more commits to add?
Yes, it should be ready - there are still a couple of style warnings, I wasn't sure which ones need to be strictly adhered to. But the core logic is there, and any remaining style issues can be dealt with after adapting to any review comments.
Good PR! I think there are a few small discussion points, but if we can resolve/discuss them, it should be good to merge in.
Thanks for the review - I've had a quick look and can address these points, might just take me a few days due to other commitments.
This pull request introduces 1 alert when merging 023090ab737f506c7548aedd57ce7cda2fb72408 into 24d9a9bb28a04280a9c4c8d2a0b6e051810eb7cf - view on LGTM.com
new alerts:
@bastula, sorry for the delay in addressing this review - I think everything is covered now, please have a look and let me know what you think.
Still a few codacy style issues, for me the lines complained about look standard, and my local style checkers pass (pycodestyle and pydocstyle).
Thanks @darcymason for addressing the changes. I'll try to take a look in the next day or two and see if we can get this merged in.
Hi @bastula, can I make a friendly nudge on this? I would like this in for a deployment that points to master. Thanks.
@darcymason Sorry I thought I was waiting for more code-level changes to come in. Merged. Thanks for all your hard work on this.
No problem. Thanks, @bastula.
Closes #274.