Open briandowns opened 1 year ago
Sounds good to me! I wonder if it's worth having a List
/ Dict
namespace then later on we can add other methods that create these from method calls, i.e:
List.new(<number>);
Dict.new(<Number>);
List.fill(...)
Dict.from([["key", "value"], [...]])
I was thinking of doing that initially but decided to keep it simple at the outset. I'm happy to do whatever you think is best. I have a working implementation but need to find all the memory I'm leaking. 😂
The joys of C right 😂 If it's not too much trouble I think the namespace would be the way to go as it saves us changing it later down the line
No trouble at all. I completely it'll be best.
Is there an existing issue for this?
Is your feature request related to a problem?
It might be helpful to have the ability to specify the initial size of list, set, and dict. A user would set the initial size of the type but wouldn't prevent them from further extension.
Describe the solution you'd like
Describe alternatives you've considered
No response
Additional context
No response