Open tgermade opened 4 years ago
Dear @tgermade,
thank you so much for your detailed report.
I'll try to look into it as soon as I find some time for debugging.
Cheers, Tobias
I got the same problem, which the ".exon_counts.bed" is not consistent with the annotation by having exon regions shorter by 1, and unexpected 1bp long blocks near the ends. Please find two records in ".exon_counts.bed" as follows.
chr15 43692242 43694048 ENST00000260383 1 f 43692242 43694048 0,255,0 2 177,1 0,1805 chr3 195101738 195112876 ENST00000326793 4 r 195101738 195112876 0,255,0 3 1,119,57 0,894,11081
The coordinate systems used in the input files are listed for your reference.
Dear Dieterich lab,
Your resources were a great help for our work! I would like to share 2 issues that we encountered when using FUCHS version 0.2.0:
For some reason we found a few instances of transcripts containing exons of negative length in our
*.exon_counts.bed
output. We quantified an RNAseR treated dataset of long paired-end reads. Do you have an idea why this is? Here an example:The exon coordinates we obtained in our
*.exon_counts.bed
files systematically disagreed with mouse genome references & CircBase annotations. We encountered the following:One example of the problems (in IGV):
You can find the code we used to correct these points here: fuchs_adjust_coordinates.txt
Thanks for your time!