Closed cyblue9 closed 5 years ago
Fine with me, but I'll just check with @digego re: naming conventions - do you want them, and what do you want them to be called?
Hi, thanks for updates!
I think that we should maintain the 'major pentatonic' as simply 'pentatonic' and then add the minor pentatonic as 'pentatonic-minor'. I don't really think of pentatonic as both major and minor. I think of it as simply pentatonic, and some people like to 'construct' a minor variant.
I'm also unsure about what ^melodic and -melodic are supposed to be? Melodic minor I'm guessing, but I'm unsure how these are supposed to translate, and how useful they are? Don't we just want (melodic . (2 1 2 2 2 2))? The 'downward' trajectory is simply aeolian?
just my 2cents
Thanks to reply!
I think that we should maintain the 'major pentatonic' as simply 'pentatonic' and then add the minor pentatonic as 'pentatonic-minor'. I don't really think of pentatonic as both major and minor. I think of it as simply pentatonic, and some people like to 'construct' a minor variant.
Since no other scale minor variants are defined, it may not be necessary to define a pentatonic minor variant as well. I cancel defining pentatonic minor variant.
I'm also unsure about what ^melodic and -melodic are supposed to be? Melodic minor I'm guessing, but I'm unsure how these are supposed to translate, and how useful they are? Don't we just want (melodic . (2 1 2 2 2 2))? The 'downward' trajectory is simply aeolian?
Oh, I see. I did not understand the melody scale well.
You are right.
I will fix to define (melody (2 1 2 2 2 2))
only.
Fixed it.
Please Re-review!
Ping... @digego
Thank you very much! 😀
Hi!
I added some scales.
REF:List of musical scales and modes
pentatonic
variable to^pentatonic
variable? (and I am going to add-pentatonic
variable.)Please review!