Closed jave closed 3 months ago
No response
not by definition a bug, but a build improvement:
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Dockerfile | 2 +-
modified Dockerfile @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -FROM openjdk:17-jdk-slim AS build +FROM docker.io/library/openjdk:17-jdk-slim AS build
RUN mkdir /build COPY pom.xml /build/
If we dont have FQIN podman builds will be flaky.
This is by design, since podman rightly considers non-qualified image names as potential attack vectors.
podman build .
for podman to build witouth requesting image clarification
Fixed.
tnx
Contact Details
No response
What happened?
not by definition a bug, but a build improvement:
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Dockerfile | 2 +-
modified Dockerfile @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -FROM openjdk:17-jdk-slim AS build +FROM docker.io/library/openjdk:17-jdk-slim AS build
RUN mkdir /build COPY pom.xml /build/
If we dont have FQIN podman builds will be flaky.
This is by design, since podman rightly considers non-qualified image names as potential attack vectors.
Steps To Reproduce
podman build .
What did you expect?
for podman to build witouth requesting image clarification
Version
No response
Optional Screenshots
No response
Relevant log output
No response