Closed EvanHahn closed 2 months ago
I'll merge this next week to give @gmaclennan a chance to chime in.
I would lean towards debouncing rather than throttling for this, with a shorter delay.
During imports (e.g. lots of additions to the DB), we only really want to send one pre-have, when it completes. For the user actually recording data, e.g. saving an observation, we want the prehave to be sent soon after they save.
I suggest a debounce of 1000ms. That should result in imports (e.g. config import) just sending a single pre-have, and for user created data, the prehave will be sent within 1 second of them saving, which should feel "snappy" to most users I think.
Changed to a 1000ms debounce. I'll land if CI passes.
Followup to 6ad3beaaff8d10d4a23a52380e73d8f76c833928. If we're adding lots of data at once (like during a config import), we shouldn't flood the network.
See this comment.