Closed sodabrew closed 10 years ago
Looks great thanks for finding this -
Given that the micronucleaus command line tool is so easy to use standalone - I don't have any ideas of what else to do to make it easier to use with a non-Arduino IDE approach - but I'm happy to help make changes if you have any more ideas.
Thanks! I wonder if this pinged @christopherpoole - Ping!
Thanks for picking this up. I had almost forgotten about it.
Without the Arudino IDE, a digispark becomes very light weight - even more so. I would say the micronucleaus command line tool is already easy enough to use. However, maybe there is scope for a more complex IDE-less example.
When I Googled "DigiSpark Makefile" I found this blog post: http://christopherpoole.github.io/developing-for-the-digispark-without-the-arduino-ide/
This looks reasonable, so I'd like to propose merging this into the mainline tree and/or discuss what else could be done to provide a non-Arduino IDE approach to building code for the DigiSpark.