Closed mattcollier closed 3 years ago
::facepalms:: Er, merely a dumb oversight on my part.
This does change the return signature of .generate(), so it'll be a fairly major breaking change. However, since we just changed the multicodec encoding of X25519 keys, we already have a major change to propagate downstream, so this'll be good.
@mattcollier Would it be ok to return the generated key inside the DidDocument?
The way did-veres-one
handles it is - generate()
returns a DID Document instance, and all the generated public/private key pairs are available at didDoc.keys
property.
We chould change the return signature of did:key
driver's generate to be {keyPair, didDoc}
, but would it be ok to match the did:v1
driver and just return didDoc
, with the key pair being available on didDoc.keys
?
@dmitrizagidulin having all the various methods have some consistent behavior would be great. Maybe we can discuss for a few moments during today's call.
@mattcollier sure thing. (Also, for a (non-binding) example of that would look like, see https://github.com/digitalbazaar/did-method-key-js/pull/22 )
Implemented in PR #22, closing.
It appears the private key material is getting dropped on the floor in the
generate
API. I expect that I would be able to get theLDKeyPair
instance returned along with the DID document. Is that an improper expectation?https://github.com/digitalbazaar/did-method-key-js/blob/master/lib/driver.js#L88-L91