Closed davidlehn closed 4 years ago
Fixes expand#tec02 & toRdf#tec02.
@gkellogg "keyword redefinition" was not what I expected for this type of error. Is that more appropriate than the more generic "invalid term definition"?
It's "keyword redefinition" as that is the case for any attempt to change a keyword, other than specific carve-outs for @type
. One could argue for "invalid term definition", but it's not a term, and it's a bit late to change the spec.
Fixes expand#tec02 & toRdf#tec02.
@gkellogg "keyword redefinition" was not what I expected for this type of error. Is that more appropriate than the more generic "invalid term definition"?