Open bertvannuffelen opened 3 years ago
Yes, this is correct, and my distiller gets the same result.
"type2" is treated as "@id", and the normal rules apply when resolving "Pers" against "http://www.w3.org/ns/person#"; the "person#" has no special meaning in resolving IRIs.
I do not find in the specification if there is any restriction on @base values, but
returns the value "http://www.w3.org/ns/Pers" for type2.
@base resolution thus remove the last thing to the last / while for many ontologies/vocabularies the practice is to use fragment identifiers.
It is this a specification issue? Or is this a implementation issue?