jira-to-github-migrator[bot]
commented
1 year ago Julia Wohlhueter - 8.12.2021, 09:23:34
Interesting, how the phase6-app solves this issue. This would be an option, too. <~nikola.hoffmann> What do you think? One more thing: As repetition is the key to language learning, it does make sense to repeat words that have been correctly answered, too (although incorrectly answered words should have a higher priority).
Stefanie Metzger - 8.12.2021, 07:45:30
Currently we are having this screen:
https://app.zeplin.io/project/5fc7c98a435298126bcfd4ee/screen/5fd7ad14b910e790be641e3e
As we added the feature, that words that have been answered incorrectly, are repeated up to three time, this screen is no longer fitting. Problem: When a user enters a word 'almost correct' and afterwards 'correct', this word will be count as 'almost correct', but if a user enters a word 'wrong' and 'correct' on the retry, it will be counted as 'correct'. Therefore the current behavior is somehow inconsistent.
We thought that maybe we make three tile: 'correct' 'correct after repeat' 'incorrect', but we couldn't think of a proper german naming for this, so we also thought about having 5 tiles: 'correct of first try' 'correct on second try / first retry' 'correct on third try / second retry', 'incorrect / not know' or something. We are not sure, what would make most sense in a UI/UX-view. What information is relevant for the user, what feedback does make sense?
in phase6-voabulary training app you just get the feedback '70% was correct', which means was correct on the first try. Maybe it makes sense to just show this information, plus the List of words, which need more learning effort (e.g. were wrong or only correct after retry), as i assume it does not really make sense for a user to review words that have been answered correctly, does it?
So just our and my thoughts about this screen, we need a good solution here from someone with UI/UX knowledge. :)
Environment: - Linked issues: