search

digitalsara / portfolio

The starter portfolio repository, basically empty, but with a few helper files.
https://learn-the-web.algonquindesign.ca/courses/web-dev-5/
0 stars 0 forks source link

Rubric #1

Closed digitalsara closed 5 years ago

digitalsara commented 6 years ago
0 points 1 points 2 points 3 points
Pages & sections Barely started Missing lots of sections/pages Has most of the sections/pages, some missing All sections/pages exist and are well done
Personality Bland, boring, just another graphic designer Fairly generic but may be better with visual design Quality layouts and unique, personable content Unique and recognizable as you, with engaging, personable content
Text content Fake content only Some real content, some fake All real content but with lots of errors Real content, well written, no grammar or spelling errors
Responsiveness Not responsive Works on some screens Responsive but with lots of awkwardness Looks great on all screen sizes
Code quality Barely started Indentation is barely existent, lots of validation errors, very poor semantics Decent indentation, just a couple validation errors, decent semantics Well indented, fully valid, good semantics
KseniaZhe commented 6 years ago

Pages & sections: 3 points. The home page and one porfolio piece page are well done. Personality: 3 points. Unique and recognizable as you, with engaging, personable content. Text content: 3 points. Real content, well written, no grammar or spelling errors Responsiveness: 3 points. Looks great on all screen sizes. Code quality: 3 points. Used classes and groups. awesome. 15/15 points!!!!

catherine9 commented 6 years ago

Pages & sections: Home page is nicely done, 3 points. Personality: Gets straight to the point simple and unique, defiantly shows it is Sara Habel, 3 points Text content: Content is nicely placed, love the font choice 3 points Responsiveness: Very Responsive, nothing is touching when at 320px, 3points Code Quality: straight forward, not too complicated 3 points

planetorium commented 6 years ago
0 points 1 points 2 points 3 points
Pages & sections Barely started Missing lots of sections/pages Has most of the sections/pages, some missing All sections/pages exist and are well done
Personality Bland, boring, just another graphic designer Fairly generic but may be better with visual design Quality layouts and unique, personable content Unique and recognizable as you, with engaging, personable content
Text content Fake content only Some real content, some fake All real content but with lots of errors Real content, well written, no grammar or spelling errors
Responsiveness Not responsive Works on some screens Responsive but with lots of awkwardness Looks great on all screen sizes
Code quality Barely started Indentation is barely existent, lots of validation errors, very poor semantics Decent indentation, just a couple validation errors, decent semantics Well indented, fully valid, good semantics