Closed jrdouceur closed 1 year ago
Alternative to #97 that avoids hard-coding DTDL class or property names in the ParserGenerator.
If this change had broken a tutorial, the PR would have failed validation, so they must be fine. Regarding tests, I suggested in #97 that you modify that PR to just be tests on top of this PR. Sound like a plan?
Alternative to #97 that avoids hard-coding DTDL class or property names in the ParserGenerator.