nh36
commented
8 years ago I am now confused because we also have the google doc. We should make our plans for adding new sources more concrete and specific. If on GitHub, then I suppose we should get the Googledoc further along and then also put the information on Github.
Dr Nathan W. Hill Reader in Tibetan and Historical Linguistics Department of China & Inner Asia and Department of Linguistics SOAS, University of London Thornhaugh Street, Russell Square, London WC1H 0XG, UK Tel: +44 (0)20 7898 4512
Profile -- http://www.soas.ac.uk/staff/staff46254.php
Tibetan Studies at SOAS -- http://www.soas.ac.uk/cia/tibetanstudies/
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Johann-Mattis List <notifications@github.com
wrote:
Let's collect sources and languages in this thread. Ideall in form of a list.
We have
- Achang
- Atsi (Lustig)
- Mann (morphemes typed, not the proto-forms, which we should add for reference and comparison)
- Hpun may be interesting
And we start for those two by making a first concept list (250 concepts), and filling it up? Or is there any other strategy? Mapping whole dictionaries to concepticon is useless, but one can try to make an automatic mapping to the dictionary entries which would then need to be re-checked. In any case: concept-linking needs to be very thorough, as we have the tools to go cross-semantic later.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/digling/burmish/issues/52, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AIdHxQEcpQMVnGPGutscjcb1NOPHFPiDks5qnddngaJpZM4J2SoZ .
LinguList
Let's collect sources and languages in this thread. Ideall in form of a list.
We have
And we start for those two by making a first concept list (250 concepts), and filling it up? Or is there any other strategy? Mapping whole dictionaries to concepticon is useless, but one can try to make an automatic mapping to the dictionary entries which would then need to be re-checked. In any case: concept-linking needs to be very thorough, as we have the tools to go cross-semantic later.