Open msnhao opened 4 years ago
Thanks for pointing this out; the negative sign in the scalar form of the energy is incorrect (as well as a few other typos). If you get the gist of the derivations, then you should be fine to use the energy formulation on the line after the one you screenshotted (which rearranges the terms into a quadratic form and a dot product), as that one is correct and matches the one used in the paper. We will fix the typos soon.
How does the negative sign disappear here? There isn't a negative sign in the substitution.