Closed baron closed 13 years ago
At Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:50:12 -0700, baron wrote:
Is it really necessary for el-get to write to my init.el, custom.el or wherever I have the el-get-standard-packages written?
There are certainly other ways it could be managed, and in fact @dimitri was not disposed favorably to me using the customization interface for this.
I think writing to a user's init.el file automatically is not ideal.
Well, I think:
I also find el-get-can-exit-p behavior to be a bit annoying, requiring an additional confirmation before I exit. I'd prefer that it do whatever it needs to save info.
Well, other users apparently often want to install packages non-committally, without any intention to have the packages be active the next time around. I'm not committing to this project anymore, but If my opinion is worth anything, I'd be open to interface variations, such as an option to turn off asking whether you want to remember installed packages. In fact, I may want that feature myself anyway: I'll probably install a hook in my config that asks about saving all customizations I've made, before exiting. Too often I'll forget that I've set something tentatively that I ended up really liking.
Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
Thank you for elaborating on this. You've clearly put a lot of thought into it. I can live with it and appreciate your work but it still feels a bit weird.
One thing I forgot to mention is the dialog asks me for every session even though I haven't made any changes. In other words it'll write the same values even if there are no changes so that's something extra for the user to do for no reason.
If we can allow el-get to write to the init with confirmation, then it would effectively be a no op when there are no changes. That would be nice enough.
I really ought to split up my init files, that's definitely something I should do. Thanks for your contributions. Why are you no longer committing?
At Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:16:27 -0700, baron wrote:
Thank you for elaborating on this. You've clearly put a lot of thought into it. I can live with it and appreciate your work but it still feels a bit weird.
Would the option to save without asking for permission help?
One thing I forgot to mention is the dialog asks me for every session even though I haven't made any changes. In other words it'll write the same values even if there are no changes so that's something extra for the user to do for no reason.
I can't imagine why that's happening for you. Can you provide instructions that reproduce it invoking emacs with -Q? Regardless, please open a new ticket for it.
If we can allow el-get to write to the init with confirmation,
I don't know what you mean. It currently writes to the init when you confirm.
then it would effectively be a no op when there are no changes. That would be nice enough.
That's exactly how it works for me.
I really ought to split up my init files, that's definitely something I should do. Thanks for your contributions. Why are you no longer committing?
Check the el-get mailing list archives or poke around http://www.rodney.com if you must know ;-)
Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
Is it really necessary for el-get to write to my init.el, custom.el or wherever I have the el-get-standard-packages written? I think writing to a user's init.el file automatically is not ideal.
I also find el-get-can-exit-p behavior to be a bit annoying, requiring an additional confirmation before I exit. I'd prefer that it do whatever it needs to save info.