Closed NerosTie closed 9 years ago
Yes, retrieve some description from the the meta-data looks like a good idea. Perhaps adding a delete button on the description field would be helpful when the provided text is broken or unwanted.
About the tags, I was thinking of a good way of handling them : would the choice of tags be based on the shared url, on the sharing app or on key words in the description ? Maybe a mix of theses. It would also need a little rework of the tags field to delete them easily, indeed adding such automation would create a significant amount of unwanted tags. The problem is that each user has its own view of what a good tag is, and I would not be the one choosing for them.
there's a lengthy thread over at https://github.com/shaarli/Shaarli/issues/322
description makes sense to me (https://github.com/mro/ShaarliOS), tags rather don't.
Could you have a look at : https://github.com/dimtion/Shaarlier/releases/tag/v1.3.0-alpha
Please tell me if you have remarks or if you find any bug.
It works well!
But more websites could be supported (because they don't use the classic meta description) if you add:
<meta property="og:description" content="" />
<meta name="twitter:description" content="" />
(plus, the Settings
menu in the app, between Share a link
and Open my Shaarli
, is useless)
Thanks for the feedback, I'll add them for the next release.
Thanks @mro for the reminder (I have probably over read your comment...)
In shaarli/Shaarli#322 they don't mention twitter:description
meta tag, what priority should be choose ? What about for example og:description
> twitter:description
> description
) ?
@dimtion I think twitter must be the last because it's limited in every case or there are hashtags inside.
I would say : description
> og:description
> twitter:description
(og=opengraph=facebook)
But maybe I'm wrong!
Yes you are right, but as @mro mentioned in https://github.com/shaarli/Shaarli/issues/322#issuecomment-132253364 og:description
should probably be first.
It could be great to have an automatic description of the link by reading the content of the meta "description".
Just like the title, but for the description.
And, maybe, tags?