Closed Fale closed 10 years ago
I'll have to verify the performance matches up with what I'd expect, but I will consider this change.
So, in my local tests, loading 1million rows went from 4m26.860928617s to 9m7.046844352s. This implies there is a pretty substantial difference in performance between the bindings, and I'm not sure that there's much that could be done to tweak this new library to perform better.
This library also calls for a hg
install instead of just being restricted to git
If you are seeing different performance, I would appreciate more data points, but as it stands I will have to close this PR un-merged. Sorry!
This library is way more common and most distro has already it in their repo.